Waaka Vercoe did not resign as the chairman of
Ngati Awa’s audit committee, he was pushed.
Mr Vercoe was replaced on the committee by new board member Brian Tunui. The committee is also comprised of board members Regina O’Brien (Gina) and Charlie Elliott, two representatives from accountant firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers and independent member Peter Taylor.
Speaking at the board meeting in April, Te
Pahipoto representative Mr Elliott was adamant that Mr Vercoe was forced
to stand down at the end of last year.
Mr Elliott said he and Mrs O’Brien had gone to
see Mr Vercoe after hearing through the grape-vine that the long-serving governor had been removed from the
committee.
“Gina and I spoke to Waaka about this issue and
Waaka didn’t resign, he was made to,” he said.
Mrs O’Brien verified Mr Elliott’s account of the
conversation with Mr Vercoe, however there was no further discussion this issue
by the board.
The issue of Mr Vercoe’s absence was first
raised by Te Runanga o Ngati Awa chief executive Enid Ratahi-Pryor at the
meeting with Ngati Hokopu at Wairaka in March.
Mrs Ratahi-Pryor said Mr Vercoe stood down
voluntarily because he was getting old and tired.
“He decided it is time for a change. It is time
for new blood.”
After that meeting I decided to check out Mrs Ratahi-Pryor’s
statements and I came away with the same story as Mr Elliott and Mrs O'Brien.
I sat with him for four hours in the kitchen of
his Wairaka home and I was entertained with a series of stories and anecdotes.
But also during that conversation he confirmed
that he had been pushed out of his seat at the head of the audit committee by
chairman of the tribe’s commercial arm, Ngati Awa Group Holdings Ltd (NAGHL).
Mr Vercoe said Wira Gardiner had forced him off
the committee after he refused to allow Omataroa Trust, which he also chairs,
to back a honey venture that Mr Gardiner was promoting.
He was obviously disappointed.
And yes, Mr Vercoe is getting old and perhaps his advanced years mean that his mind is not as sharp as it was but he still has experience and knowledge.
And he feels he still has something to give the tribe.
Coincidentally, however, Mr Vercoe was the
person who signed off the controversial audit committee that highlighted Mr
Gardiner’s role in the conflict of interest surrounding NAGHL board member
Graham Pryor.
Mr Gardiner could not be reached for comment.
Obviously this is a he says/she says situation but I would like to know how people are selected for the
sub-committees of the TRONA and NAGHL boards and who decides when the members
should stand down.
The committees are important tools in the
operations of Te Runanga o Ngati Awa and at the end of the day the organisation was
created to manage our assets. Therefore I would like to know that the responsibility
has been entrusted to the people who have the right skills and motivations to
do the jobs.
Meanwhile, speaking of jobs I wanted to share some news. On the back of this blog I am
currently in talks with the editor of the Whakatane Beacon, Mark Longley, about
becoming a regular contributor to the newspaper.
My proposal was that I could be a weekly
contributor who writes about local issues as a trained journalist and from a Maori
point of view.
Mr Longley has been reading this blog and said
he would be very interested in a regular column.
We spoke of broadening the focus of Tu Mai Te Toki.
And while Ngati Awa politics will at times be the
subject of the column, neither of us want it be contained to such a narrow
purpose. Nor do I want the column, and the blog, to always be negative.
He has gone away to crunch the numbers and asked to see a draft column so he could see how I write.
Therefore, I wanted to show Mr Longley, and you, that I could write
about another issue.
This is what I submitted:
A group of Whakatane residents have
fiercely opposed a scientific trial to clean up the poisoned Kopeopeo canal.
Submissions
on the Regional Council's application for resource consent to remove and clean
up sediment contaminated with dioxins from the canal closed this week. A decision will be announced after a hearing but given the level of interest in
this situation I decided to write about the debate.
The Kopeopeo
canal was identified as a contaminated area after surface run-off and storm-water
containing Pentachlorophenol (PCP) from the NZ Forest Products Ltd sawmill was
discharged into it between 1950 and 1989.
Used by the mill to treat timber, PCP has been found to contain dioxins that can
cause diabetes, pancreatic cancer, leukemia, auto-immune diseases and other
disorders.
The group of
residents who are fiercely opposing the consent attended the consultation meetings held by the Whakatane District
Council and many of its members were strongly vocal at the final meeting held
at Wairaka Marae this week.
They believe the dioxins could be spread if the resource consent is granted and they want to leave the clean-up until further research has been done.
Listening to their points it seems there is an element of "not in my back-yard" and I reckon they have missed the point.
The canal is
not the only contaminated site in the area.
There are at least 36 sites in
Whakatane, more across the country, and the Regional Council is using the
project to trial the process with the hope that it could be used to clean up
the other spots.
It is something my Dad believes in.
He was five-years-old when he
used to swim in the Kopeopeo Canal every day. By the time he turned six, his
family had moved to Muriwai Drive and the house across road from the mudflats
that were beginning to be filled with waste from the mill.
Then when he was 18-years old, he
started working at the mill.
My Dad knows
about PCP and has the scars to prove it.
Buckled by
the debilitating disease that has turned his body against itself, my Dad has
lived with it for almost every day of his life. It is a legacy he has passed on
to me and perhaps to my son.
As a result
he is passionate about finding a way to clean it up and that is why he joined
the watchdog group, Sawmill Workers Against Poisons (SWAP).
Now he is the
chairman and a facilitator for the group. He has read the research, talked with
the people and heard the arguments.
It is not going to be easy but he
says he has faith in the science.
Under the trial, the Regional Council is working with the community on the
project to clean up the canal to remove, store and clean up the contaminated
sediment using bioremediation. The method looks to break down contaminants
using trees and mushrooms.
And it has its results.
The next
stage of the trial requires a section of the canal to be drained, the sediment
removed and trucked to three separate pits that will be lined with Geonet mat
to stop the contaminants leeching out. The pits are then inoculated and planted
with mushrooms and trees
It is hoped that the levels of dioxin in the soil will be reach acceptable levels within 15
years.
The process
was designed by scientists from Massy and Waikato Universities and the
operations have been planned by experts who have been careful and meticulous.
Risks are
minimal, my Dad says to me, and the results could be immense.
The time for
sitting on our hands is over.
